Depth of the Rabobank team's doping practices is revealed in testimonies given during Geert Leinders investigation


The measures that the former Rabobank team took to dope its riders, and conceal the use of banned substances, has been revealed in testimonies given during Dr Geert Leinders’ doping investigation.

Former Rabobank riders Michael Rasmussen and Levi Leipheimer both gave testimonies as part of the investigation into Leinders’ activities in the team between 1996 and 2009. It resulted in Leinders receiving a lifetime ban.

As part of Rasmussen’s testimony, he says that former team-mate Michael Boogerd had received a blood transfusion from his brother during the 2002 Tour de France. Leipheimer, too, used his brother’s blood to boost his red blood cell count and improve his performance.

They are among the many still shocking statements made in the testimonies.

The full decision relating to the Leinders case has been published on the United States Anti-Doping (USADA) website, and makes for sober reading. Despite past revelations unearthed by investigations and ‘tell all’ books published by former riders, the details of the Rabobank team’s cynical doping practices still has the power to shock.

>>> Former Rabobank and Sky team doctor banned for life

Blood transfusions on the team bus, insulin smuggled under the proviso it was for a diabetic member of the team staff, open meetings on how to evade tests, cortisone injections and the ever-present EPO and testosterone regimes are all outlined.

Just like the US Postal case that brought about a lifetime ban for Lance Armstrong, the organisation and professionalism of the team’s doping stands out – in particular the use of the Human Plasma clinic for the removal and storage of blood for later transfusion.

Leipheimer – who has thus far not talked openly about his doping – says in his testimony that he discussed his EPO use with Leinders on immediately joining the team, and they worked out a plan for him to take the drug. He used EPO to prepare for the 2002 and 2003 Tour de France, and blood transfusions and EPO prior to the 2003 Vuelta a Espana, among other races.

Denis Menchov is also implicated in the testimonies.

The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) does not come out of the report well. In a testimony provided by Steven Teitler, manager of legal affairs for Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands, he says that UCI chief medical officer Mario Zorzoli told him that the UCI would contact Rabobank if a suspect anti-doping result was reported.

“Zorzoli confirmed that when a blood test reflected a suspicious result, UCI would contact a Rabobank team doctor, either Dr Leinders or another doctor, to discuss the potential cause of the result.”

Teitler implied that this was a way of the UCI controlling the team’s doping without any results ever being published. “Riders and staff would have the idea that the UCI was basically on top of them and they had to be careful with what they would do in terms of doping,” he said.

The UCI confirmed on Thursday evening that Zorzoli had been suspended from anti-doping duties at the UCI after the decision was published.

Rabobank ended its long-term sponsorship of the team in 2012 after the Armstrong doping revelations.

Given the clarity of the evidence, and the seemingly open nature in which Leinders, his riders and the Rabobank team as a whole discussed and administered doping, it makes Team Sky’s argument for employing Leinders in 2011 harder than ever to justify – particularly given former Sky DS Steven de Jongh’s tenure at Rabobank at the height of Leinders’ doping regime in 2000-2005.

  • Graham Salmun

    Geert Leinders joins Team sky in 2011, bradley wiggins wins in 2012 (with chris froome 2nd) and froome wins in 2013. Just make doping legal in pro sports already. Everyone thats winning is already doing it, might as well even out the playing field for the guys that arent and dont have any chance of winning.

  • Marco

    Im so glad Leinders had completely stopped all this and just prescribed vitamins when he was at team sky.

  • jonathan polley

    Pharmaceutical evolution is probably more accurate as is
    Hinault for spelling! Note to self, check spelling before publishing!

  • jonathan polley

    Peter, by the time LL was winning, it had stretched my credulity very thin. I started racing in the late 80’s stopped early 90’s. The riders I looked up to were Kelly, Miller, Roche, Heinault, Flignon they all turn out to be stepping stones of narcotic evolution from anquetil’s ‘just water’ quote, to the tragedy of Simpson, to the the lies of lance. Some exceptions? I have a slither of faith in lemond and boardman. I guess all the best heroes of our youth are flawed, but you only understand the flaws and contextualise them with the benefit of age and experience. Question is, what now?

  • SickyLeaks

    I found The Secret Race very good, and would recommend it. Certainly removed the scales from my eyes.

  • Peter Marlow

    Well let’s put it another way – having watched cycling since 1969, I’d have been a very naive viewer indeed NOT to have sussed the guy straight off. The era he rode in, the ridiculous performances of so many other American riders of that period….. and you thought he was a really talented rider right? Wrong.

    I got in all sorts of trouble on CN’s forum for outing Tyler H after he won the Olympic TT – oddly I was proved right.

    I’m not a know-all, neither do I think every rider is doped – far from it. But LL – c’mon, obvious doesn’t cover it.

  • A.S.

    Of course you did.

  • Peter Marlow

    I knew LL was doped the first time I ever saw him riding.