It's a very open secret that SRAM is developing a wireless electronic groupset, but what should we expect when the launch finally comes.

When we received an invitation to a SRAM product launch in California a few weeks ago, we thought the day had finally arrived that the new SRAM wireless groupset, possibly the worst kept secret in cycling, was finally going to be unveiled to the public.

Instead SRAM announced its new single ring 1x Road groupset which, although quite possibly a game-changer in the long term, was not what much of the cycling world had been waiting for.

Despite having already chalked up victory courtesy of Domenico Pozzovivo at the Giro del Trentino, SRAM still isn’t giving an exact date for the unveiling of the groupset, although UCI regualtions state that prototype equipment used in races, as SRAM Wireless was at the Tour Down Under in January, must be available on the market within nine months. This would give SRAM a deadline of late September to release the new groupset, so we’d expect an official release before the end of the season.

SRAM009p

Domenico Pozzovivo took the SRAM Wireless’ first victory at the Giro del Trentino

In the meantime we’re left to speculate as to the final details. So what should we expect from the final production version of SRAM Wireless? What do we already know and what still remains a mystery?

No more DoubleTap

Aside from the obvious point that this is an electronic groupset with wireless shifting, the most notable departure from SRAM’s exising groupsets is the abandonment of the DoubleTap system. In case you’re unfamiliar with the system, it is used on all of SRAM’s existing road groupsets, and controls shifting using only a single paddle behind each brake lever, which you pushed one notch inwards to shift up and two notches to shift down.

>>>Review: SRAM Apex groupset

However the SRAM wireless groupset looks set to employ an entirely new system. The single paddle behind each brake lever remains, but that’s where the similarities end. With the new system, which is set to be christened “eTap”, you will simply press one paddle inwards to shift the rear derailleur up, and press the paddle behind the other lever to move it down.

Mark Cavendish Specialized Venge CVNDSH edition

A new eTap system looks set to replace the DoubleTap system used on previous SRAM groupsets

Moving between chainrings is even more of a departure from DoubleTap, with the front derailleur shifted by pressing both left and right paddles roughly simultaneously.

>>>Road bike groupsets: a buyer’s guide

The one major thing that remains unclear with the shifting is if SRAM Wireless will allow for multiple shifts by holding down the paddles, as is the case with Shimano Dura-Ace Di2. We’re also unsure whether the front derailleur will automatically adjust to avoid chain rub depending on where the chain is on the cassette.

Individual batteries

The wireless setup means that SRAM Wireless will not be able to operate from a single central battery unit in the same way as Shimano and Campagnolo’s electronic systems. Instead, each individual component will contain an individual battery, hence the black casing on the back of the front and rear derailleurs.

SRAM005p(1)

The black casing on the rear of the derailleur should contain a CR2032 coin-style battery

Conveniently, the system will use CR2032 coin-style batteries, the sort you can pick up relatively cheaply on the high street. However, you shouldn’t find yourself searching out the nearest Tesco having run out of juice mid-ride, as battery life is expected to be anything up to a year.

>>>Review: Shimano Ultegra Di2

The impressive battery life is down to the fact that the automatic mode for the shifters and derailleurs is “sleep”, with them only waking up once you press the shifting lever. This is a welcome difference from Campagnolo EPS, which has to be turned on and off manually.

Pairing

The patent for SRAM Wireless contains plenty of details of the process of pairing the derailleurs with the shifters. In essence the process is pretty simple, and should allow for easy customisation of shifting.

Each derailleur will come with a button that will put it into pairing mode, and pushing one of the shifters will then link that action with the derailleur. Each component comes with its own ID, meaning that you should only have to do this process once.

SRAM008pPairing should be made easier by the LED lights which are built into each component, indicating whether they are successfully paired or not. These lights could also be used to indicate battery life, errors and when components are in need of maintenance, although we’re not sure about this just yet.

Garmin link up

The introduction of Shimano’s D-Fly system allowed you to link your electronic shifting with your Garmin Edge 1000, 810, or 510 cycling computer, meaning you could easily see what gear you were in as well as other information such as battery life.

It looks as though SRAM Wireless will contain a similar system, and will be able to communicate using either ANT+ or Bluetooth Smart. Whether this will be built into the first production version of SRAM Wireless or whether it will be released in a later software update remains to be seen, although we might expect the latter, as very few details are offered in SRAM’s patent application.

Remote Shifters?

The big question that remains unanswered with SRAM Wireless is whether there will be anything comparable to the sprinters’ and climbers’ shifters which have been so popular with the pros running Shimano Di2.

RUS_8116

Shimano Di2’s satellite shifters have proved very popular in the peloton

Half the peloton seemed to be running some sort of satellite shifters at Paris-Roubaix, either with sprinters’ shifters located on the inside of the drops, or climbers’ shifters on the tops. These systems have also proved popular with time triallists, who have been able to fit shifters next to the brakes to allow them to shift down when approaching corners, and up when sprinting out of them.

We haven’t seen anything of this sort on the bikes of Ag2r-La Mondiale just yet, but if SRAM Wireless is going to compete with Shimano Di2 in the pro peloton, some sort of remote shifting is a must.

1x Compatible?

Following SRAM’s recent announcement of its 1x road groupset, it would seem strange if the company made its wireless offering incompatible with a wide range of gear options. Of course Ag2r-La Mondiale have only been running short cage derailleurs while testing SRAM Wireless, but if the system is going to be able to accommodate the 11-42 cassette which will be available with the single ring setup, then there will need to be a medium cage rear derailleur on sale.

  • fasterthanu

    Thank god no more wire set up bullshit

  • winkybiker

    The big issue that I see is that the front shifting action is identical to either shift up or down. If you’re not in the ring you thought you were, shifting will have the opposite effect of what you wanted. Imagine you’re approaching a steep ramp. It’s late in the day, you’re tired and going hard. You think you’re in a 53×19, but you’re actually in a 39×14 (same ratio). You don’t check and go to shift down for the ramp and now you’re in a 53×14 instead of the 39×19 you expected. Quite a shock. Now you have two more shifts (that can’t be done simultaneously) to sort it out and get going properly. You’ve been gapped and will ride to the finish alone. I think people will hate it.

    A system that uses an identical action to trigger one of two opposite actions, the selection of which depends on a pre-existing condition (the chain-ring you’re on) that requires either memory or conscious verification (looking down to check) is error-enforcing. They just haven’t thought this through.

  • riderforlife44

    Di2 still allows you to shift chaining’s and cassette position
    at the same time whilst it trims the front mech cage for you.

    That’s 3 things happening at once. Campy EPS does the same

    By pressing both levels on the SRAM ‘e-tap’ system, sounds
    like you have to accomplish front and rear mech changes separately. ( to shift front chainring, and then to shift 2 or 3 cogs
    down on cassette – if u were on a compact anyway)

    That’s not as slick as di2, (and even existing SRAM mechanical
    double tap) in exchange for shedding 20 grams of cables?

    Can’t see it myself!