Governing body's technical manager descrbes the rule as "a relic of the past"

With bike technology getting more and more advanced, the UCI is looking at scrapping the 6.8kg limit on minimum bike weight used in races.

First introduced in 2000, the minimum weight rule was originally intended to ensure safety at a time when there was considerable unease about new lightweight carbon bikes, but with advances in technology, and with some teams having to add lead weights to top tubes and drop chains down seat tubes for ballast, the rule has seemed increasingly out of date in reent years.

>>> How does weight affect your climbing speed (video)

In an interview with Australian website Cycling Tips (in which he also admitted that motorised bikes could have been used in WorldTour races), UCI technical manager Mark Barfield said that the world governing body was “a relic of the past” and “in our sights”.

However this is not to say bike manufacturers will simply be giving free rein to develop the lightest bikes possible for professional riders, with the 6.8kg rule likely to be replaced with another standard.

Watch: Best lightweight bike of the year 2016

“[The new rule] will be a safety-based standard and not a weight. What we are looking at are the standards that are currently in place and seeing if they are fit for purpose. If they are fit for purpose then that might be a very simple and elegant solution. If they are not, then we need to see what has to be added to ensure what is fit for purpose”

Barfield also offered some supprt for the 6.8kg rule, saying that not only had it done a good job ensuring rider safety, but had also helped to fuel development in other areas since it was first introduced over 15 years ago.

>>> At just 4.4kg, is this the lightest bike in the world?

“For some manufacturers it provides some reassurance; they think that they can build aero bikes, that they can add electronic gearing or they can do whatever they like around the bike and it will still be 6.8kg.”

So will we see the pros riding sub-6kg machines from the start of 2016? Well, unfortunately not, with the rule change looking to be a long-term rather than a short-term procedure, and Barfield stressing the need for cooperation between the UCI and bicycle manufacturers for the rule change to be successfully implemented.

When the change does come about, it will be the latest in a series of changes to the UCI’s technical regulations in recent weeks, that has seen the wider introduction of disc brakes into the peloton, and the relaxation of rules governing downward tilted saddles that have been criticised by time triallists for a number of years.

  • Dick_Turpin

    “UCI technical manager Mark Barfield said that the world governing body was “a relic of the past” and “in our sights”.”

    Lol at the ironic typo, presume you were talking about the weight limit here? Or is one of the UCIs own employees being a little *too* honest? 😉

  • Jay

    Coming across from left field. It bewilders me the UCI is always mumbling about safety (like the use of disc brakes) and make it sound like its on par with motor racing. Nowadays all the injuries you see from crashes involving broken bones and flash wounds could be eliminated altogether if they make riders wear protective and padded clothing. Of course not to the extreme of motorbikes but relative to the dangers of a bunched up sprint and fast descents. They don’t even have padded barriers in the final km to the finish or around dangerous corners.

    UCI is pretty backwards and should really look at simpler and more effective solutions rather than fearing carbon frames might slapped if it’s too light or hot discs burning skins in a collision.

    Totally agree the sport needs a major overhaul.

  • Butty

    I have my B&D with 7mm drill at the ready.

  • J1

    The rule is at odds with their approved frames system, because you can make a super light bike using a UCI approved frame, so they obviously don’t see an issue with the frames being fragile or unsafe, which is why they bought this rule in.