Tour de France 2014 winner says that his first reaction to finding out about his Astana teammates' positive tests was "rage"

Tour de France champion Vincenzo Nibali reacted to the recent doping cases in his Astana team by saying they are “ugly” but “isolated.”

In the last two months, three Kazakh cyclists, brothers Maxim and Valentin Iglinskiy, and Ilya Davidenok tested positive for banned drugs.

“The first reaction when learning of this is rage,” the Italian said at 2015 Tour presentation yesterday, according to France’s Le Monde newspaper.

“You say; ‘But damn, how is it possible that something like this is still happening today?’ You really have to be stupid” said Nibali.

“This is an isolated case. We’re speaking of two brothers, it happens in families, outside of the team. It’s ugly because the entire team must pay the consequences, even if it has nothing to do with this story.”

Davidenok failed an anti-doping test for steroids, but raced for Astana’s continental, third division team. The Iglinskiys both failed tests for EPO while racing for the Kazakhstany WorldTour team.

Maxim Iglinskiy played a key role to help Nibali win the Tour this July and previously won the 2012 Liège-Bastogne-Liège classic by catching and passing Nibali, who was then with team Liquigas, in the final 1.3 kilometres.

Cycling’s governing body, the UCI last week called the doping scandal “an extremely serious situation” that reflects poorly on the team and its management. It asked the licence commission to review Astana’s WorldTour status. The team will have to explain itself in the coming month based on the commission’s ethical criterion.

The commission withheld Katusha’s licences for similar problems in 2012, though the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) later ruled it could not do so and allowed the team to race in the top tier for 2013.

Tour de France organiser ASO took things in to their own hands in 2008 by barring Astana from participating in its race because of doping problems in the previous year.

“There will probably be sanctions, but I think it is the concerned riders that should pay, not us, because they are the ones who did it, not us,” Nibali continued.

“It would need to be a big ban. Apparently two-year suspensions are no longer sufficient.”

Nibali explained that followers should not consider his Tour de France victory ride suspicious.

“I answered every [doping] question, I never avoided the subject. I have always been transparent and available on these questions, even when I was at team Liquigas,” Nibali added.

“Things have changed thanks to the anti-doping agencies, it’s a good thing that they do more and more controls.”

  • Ian Ferguson

    are they just testing the doping controls? You have to be a bit suspicious

  • simon peacock

    You have to wonder how Dopers like Vinokourov are considered viable appointments at Senior levels within world tour teams. Especially when the actions of that individual have had such a major negative impact on the team in previous years.

  • reece46

    ‘reflects poorly on the team and it’s management’. Alternatively the management (Vino and Martinelli) are reflecting on the team.