The new parcours of the Tour of Flanders gave us a great winner, but an underwhelming race.
Words by Edward Pickering
>> Struggling to get to the shops try 6 issues of Cycling Weekly magazine for just £6 delivered to your door <<
Sunday April 1, 2012
New route, same old winner. Tom Boonen took a deserved victory in the 2012 Tour of Flanders: he was the best sprinter among the clearly strongest riders, and there were few points in the race when he looked anything but. Can you think of a single moment, especially after co-favourite Fabian Cancellara had crashed out, when Boonen looked under threat?
With such a tough route, there was never going to be a surprise winner, but the organisers can breathe a sigh of relief that the new parcours and finish had such an illustrious champion. Boonen became the fifth rider in history to take a third Ronde, and it’s fair to say he’s by some distance the most popular man in Belgium right now.
But it’s possible that the reflected glory of Boonen’s historic win might blind us to the flaws of the new course. The arguments for and against changing the iconic Muur/Bosberg finale to a trio of finishing circuits around the Kwaremont and Paterberg have been well-rehearsed, and Lionel Birnie warned of the potential drawbacks in the run-up to the race.
However, now we have concrete evidence to go on. The Kwaremont-Paterberg combination, always damaging in previous years, where they appeared earlier on the route, cast a baleful shadow over the tactics of the race. The most fascinating thing about cycling, which fans of marathon running can never understand, is how important strategy is. The best-designed races give the strongest a good chance of winning, but they also give the riders who aren’t the strongest an extremely fair chance themselves. Today’s Tour of Flanders gave those riders very little, unlike Milan-San Remo, two weeks ago.
The first time up the Oude Kwaremont stretched, then broke the bunch. The second time did so again. While the second lap Paterberg crash interfered with the natural development of the race, a pattern was established: the race would fragment over the climbs, but then coalesce, ready to break up again up the Kwaremont.
There was plenty of anticipation that the new finale was so hard, the riders would come in in twos and threes. But instead, it had a chilling effect on tactics. Garmin seemed to have a good plan, putting Tyler Farrar in the early break, but their leader Sep Vanmarcke simply didn’t have the strength to be able to make an advantage out of it. Nor did anybody else, except Boonen, Pozzato and Ballan.
And so the third time up the Kwaremont, the three strongest simply rode away. There was little finesse, no subtlety, just boiled-down, concentrated logic. Cycling tactics for people with short attention spans.
And what the hills had started, the cross-headwind on the run-in finished off. Any ideas Ballan and Pozzato might have had about working Boonen over were quickly blown away.
Could anybody else have won? Cancellara, of course, but he crashed out. The race after his crash was defined to some extent by his absence. But it was more defined by the absence of the Muur and Bosberg. The race is going to finish in Oudenaarde for the foreseeable future, but the organisers would be wise to tweak their route for 2013.