Debate: What next for anti-doping: evolution or revolution? (video)

Watch highlights of the the doping debate from the University of Brighton, chaired by Michael Hutchinson
Playlist 19 Videos Debate: What next for anti-doping: evolution or revolution? (video) 18:56 Watch: Tour de Pharmacy film trailer pokes fun at doping in pro cycling 01:11 How does the UCI test for hidden motors? (video) 02:04 'I'd rather see young riders using motors than blood bags' (video) 01:22 Pro bike: Adam Yates's Scott Addict RC 03:56 Pro bike: Peter Sagan’s Specialized S-Works Venge 04:12 July's tech of the month: new products from Garmin, 100%, Prime and Cannondale 19:54 Pro bike: Geraint Thomas's Pinarello Dogma F12 04:35 June’s tech of the month: New Brompton X, Cannondale SystemSix and Maxxis tyres 20:54 April's Tech of the Month: Canyon Aeroad with SRAM AXS, new Vittoria tyres and Fulcrum wheels 26:29 Watch: Taking on the toughest climbs of the Tour of Flanders 13:52 The Lead Out: April 2019 - Cobbled Classics preview 36:50 The Lead Out: March 2019 - Milan-San Remo preview 34:48 March's Tech of the Month: Pinarello, new Specialized shoes, DT Swiss wheels and Evoc's bike bag 27:06 Watch: Tour of Oman 2019 stage four highlights 05:38 Watch: Tour of Oman 2019 stage three highlights 05:36 Watch: Tour of Oman 2019 stage two highlights 06:33 Watch: Tour of Oman 2019 stage one highlights 05:31 The Lead Out: February 2019 - Sprinter's special, UAE Tour & Omloop Het Nieuwsblaad preview 24:07

On March 29, Cycling Weekly co-hosted with the University of Brighton a live debate between a handpicked selection of experts who spend their lives thinking about, and trying to solve, sport’s deep-rooted doping problems.

The event was inspired by two recent comment pieces published in CW, the first by sports ethics specialist Dr Paul Dimeo, who called for a revolution in anti-doping policy — a complete re-evaluation of what we mean by ‘cheating’.

In response, genetics expert Professor Yannis Pitsiladis countered that current anti-doping measures can succeed provided they evolve via improved testing and more severely punitive deterrents. Thus the debate was born — anti-doping: evolution or revolution?

>>> ‘British Tour de France riders’ among 150 sportspeople ‘doped’ by London doctor

The event began with presentations from Olivier de Hon from the Anti-Doping Knowledge Centre of the Netherlands and Dr Richard Budgett OBE, Scientific and Medical Director of the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

There followed a head-to-head debate between Dimeo and Pitsiladis, adroitly chaired by CW columnist Dr Michael Hutchinson, and concluded with an audience Q&A — featuring questions submitted to CW via Twitter using #dopingdebate.

>>> More than 100 athletes have tested positive for meldonium already in 2016

The fascinating debate covered a wide array of discussion points, including the possible implications of liberalisation, discrepancies in the way doping is perceived across different countries and cultures, the ‘level playing field’ concept, and the risk of wrongful conviction for substances that are not truly performance-enhancing.