Why is it that the fittest riders often have such exposed piping?
We’ve all seen pictures of the legs of rider’s when they’re at peak fitness. Veins standing up like protuberant tree roots surging up against the skin, criss-crossing his quads and calves – it certainly makes for an arresting image. But what’s the physiological explanation?
When Bora–Hansgrohe rider Paweł Poljański shared pictures of his jaw-dropping legs across social media after stage 16 of the 2017 Tour de France, pundits emerged from all quarters to chip in their views on the how exceptional (or not) Poljański’s legs were.
He’s not the only one to have drawn attention for his veiny pedal pushers.
Canadian pro Antoine Duchesne showed off his defined tree trunks after he missed out on a Tour call up (gotta get them some air time after all that hard work!) and this year Lotto-Soudal’s Tomasz Marczynski bowled us all over with his exceptionally chiselled pipes (and muscles), asserting “Looks like Le Tour is coming!”
In an attempt to explain the phenomenon behind these snaking estuaries of blood transportation, The Times’ resident doctor, Mark Porter, ventured to temper the hype around Poljański’s legs by suggesting that the veiny-ness on display was in fact quite normal.
“Although the image looks an extreme example,” wrote Porter, “this is exactly what happens in all of us after exercise in warm conditions. You just can’t see it because most of us have much more body fat.”
Fair enough: professional riders have very little body fat, around six to eight per cent, but was this really an adequate explanation? Plenty of riders are very lean, but rarely do we see legs with such startlingly bulging bloodlines.
“The notion that we’d all have legs like that if only we were skinny enough isn’t really correct,” says exercise physiologist Dr Jamie Pringle. The truth, as ever, is more complicated than the tabloids’ brisk explainers would have us believe. Just as important as leanness are athletic adaptations in the vascular system.
“In athletes, we see exceptional vascularisation,” Pringle continues. “That means greater non-visible capillarisation within the muscle, but also greater visible vascularisation at an arterial and venous level.”
In other words, the gruelling training undertaken by a pro cyclist expands both the supply of oxygenated blood to the muscles and the extraction of deoxygenated blood, via veins, back to the heart and lungs.
“There is not more piping as such, but greater arterial diameters and definitely greater flow and dilatation — in response to the muscle’s demand for blood and oxygen.”
Bear in mind, in the example of Poljański, the Polish rider had just finished the punishing 165km from Le Puy-en-Velay to Romans-sur-Isère in blustery conditions and crossed the line a mere 1min 43sec behind stage winner Michael Matthews. His leg muscles had been screaming for blood for hours.
A super-adapted blood-supply network is no great advantage in itself, nor does it account for super-veiny legs — the major factor is having more blood.
“An extremely well trained athlete has far greater blood volume as a whole, referred to as hypervolemia,” says Pringle. “Because of that, their veins are simply fuller. That’s the key difference.”
We’re not talking a few drops of blood, either — the difference is substantial.
“An untrained person has around five litres of blood, typically around 50 – 75ml per kilo — five to seven per cent — of body mass. A world-class endurance athlete can have two or three litres more in total, and as much as 150ml per kilo — 15 per cent — of body mass.”
So pro riders, like those pictured, could have twice as much blood in their bodies compared to the average Joe. No wonder their legs occasionally look set to burst.