The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
Thank you for signing up to The Pick. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
As British Cycling's Policy adviser Chris Boardman has recently been playing a high profile role in campaigning for better conditions for cyclists. Cycling Weekly asked the Olympic medallist about his proactive campaigning.
What was the biggest driving force behind you becoming a campaigner for cycle safety?
CB: I sat on the National Cycling Strategy Board about 15 years ago. It was a body set up to advise government on cycling-related transport policy.
I didn't realise that setting up a committee was a way of making it look like you were doing something when, in fact, you weren't. It struck me as ludicrous that as a society we weren't saying, "Let's enable people to travel by this mode of transport, because it's brilliant." And the fact that we still aren't, is driving me up the wall.
What makes cycling so attractive?
CB: I just think that cycling is an ideal method of getting from A to B for short journeys, which make up about 70 per cent of those travelled, and it benefits everybody. It's more a question of what happens if we don't develop transport in this way.
There are 35,000 deaths each year that are directly related to obesity and we're not meeting pollution emission targets at all.
What are the key factors for lasting change?
CB: There has to be political will. We've just assumed that the positive situation in the Netherlands and Denmark was a result of their culture, as though cycling had always been a part of daily life.
But actually, in the 1970s, they were going exactly the same way as the rest of Europe, but said, "Hang on, this is not the way that we want to live."
How do you react when politicians are quick to make encouraging statements but act slowly?
CB: It's just infuriating. It's great when the government makes statements, like it did this year, saying that the aim is to make Britain a cycling nation - brilliant!
But then it goes ahead and allocates only £159 million for cycling, and only for two years. It just doesn't add up, does it?
This article was first published in the November 28 issue of Cycling Weekly. Read Cycling Weekly magazine on the day of release where ever you are in the world International digital edition, UK digital edition. And if you like us, rate us!
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Get The Leadout Newsletter
Founded in 1891, Cycling Weekly and its team of expert journalists brings cyclists in-depth reviews, extensive coverage of both professional and domestic racing, as well as fitness advice and 'brew a cuppa and put your feet up' features. Cycling Weekly serves its audience across a range of platforms, from good old-fashioned print to online journalism, and video.
Primož Roglič confirms he will leave Jumbo-Visma
Giro d'Italia champion does not reveal his destination for 2024 yet, though
By Adam Becket Published
Dr Hutch: The aesthetics of the 'chest-fairing' is a funny hill to want to die on
The earnest buffoonery of budget aero hacks may rile TT diehards, but Cycling Weekly's columnist salutes the cut-price cunning of their innovations
By Michael Hutchinson Published