Paralympic cyclist Sarah Storey was issued with a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) after a urine sample at the London 2012 Paralympics was found to have a level of salbutamol over the permitted limit, the Times has revealed.
Salbutamol is a drug used to treat asthma, and athletes are allowed to use it in specified quantities, but it's also considered to be performance-enhancing in high doses so an acceptable limit is set by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Salbutamol was the drug at the centre of Chris Froome’s anti-doping investigation in 2017, of which he was cleared.
Storey’s case came after she was tested regularly following her first gold medal at the London Paralympics in late August 2012, returning an adverse analytical finding soon after and subesequently being issued a TUE permitting the use of the substance. Usually, TUEs are obtained in advance.
That first gold medal was the individual pursuit in her disability category, Britain’s first gold at the Paralympic Games, before going on to win three more in the road race, time trial and 500m time trial. Television footage shows Storey using her inhaler a few minutes after winning the individual pursuit.
Storey told the Times, through her lawyer, that she experienced “breathing difficulties” after the race and used her reliever inhaler as she was about to speak to journalists. She does not deny that she returned an adverse analytical finding.
The now-43-year-old also said that having been diagnosed with asthma as a child she has since become “less inclined” to use her inhaler after races “given the way retroactive TUEs have been portrayed by the press”.
The British Paralympic Association (BPA) has told the Telegraph it’s confident everything was done by the book, with the International Paralympic Committee IPC), WADA and the UCI all aware of the situation.
The IPC said it took a week for the BPA to be notified of the adverse finding, and that Storey was not told until after she had won the three other gold medals at the Games. It was after the final medal that the BPA then applied for a retroactive TUE on behalf of Storey.
This meant that the adverse finding was not recorded as a positive drugs test. After 2012 the rules on TUEs have changed, and WADA are now the only organisation permitted to grant retroactive TUEs.
In response, a British Cycling spokesman said:
“Our understanding is that both the British Paralympic Association and the rider followed the appropriate processes, and that the International Paralympic Committee, UK Anti-Doping and the World Anti-Doping Agency have raised no concerns either at the time or since.
“As one of our responsibilities as a governing body is to give a voice to athletes in our sport, we must raise concerns at what would appear to be a substantial breach of privacy without a substantial demonstration that this was in the public interest.
“One of the reasons why WADA’s processes are confidential is to protect athlete well-being so we are particularly concerned by the impact stories like this could have on athletes who may under-use their medicine, and harm their health, rather than risk their private medical records becoming public in the future.”
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1