'We did a beautiful race up until 10km to go' - Visma-Lease a Bike pull defeat from the jaws of victory at Dwars door Vlaanderen

With such a difficult second place on Wednesday, could this performance affect confidence ahead of the Tour of Flanders?

Neilson Powless in pink leads Tiesj Benoot, Wout van Aert, and Matteo Jorgenson in yellow on the cobbles
(Image credit: Getty Images)

No-one could believe what had just happened. Not Visma-Lease a Bike’s Matteo Jorgenson, the defending champion, who finished fourth. Not Visma-Lease a Bike’s Tiesj Benoot, who finished third. Not Visma-Lease a Bike’s Wout van Aert, the Wout van Aert, who finished second. Especially not EF Education-EasyPost’s Neilson Powless, who finished first.

From a final group of four at Dwars door Vlaanderen on Wednesday, three in the yellow of Visma-Lease a Bike, Powless in pink somehow won. The slumped heads of Benoot, Jorgenson and Van Aert said it all as they crossed the line.

In his post-victory interview on TV, Powless had to catch himself as he recounted the finalé - “I knew Wout, I thought Wout would be the strongest in the sprint”. He was right, we all knew Van Aert would be the strongest there. It turns out we were wrong, everyone was wrong.

How had Visma allowed this to happen? It wasn’t a carbon copy of Ian Stannard’s improbable victory against three Quick-Step riders at Omloop Het Nieuwsblad in 2015, but it was like a tribute show. The four were alone from 55km to go, and that should have been it, with Powless dispatched. It should be said that the final straight came after a tight corner, with the difficulty that that brings, but it was still a result no-one expected.

Post-race, Jorgenson was open about the horror for his team: “We did a beautiful race up until 10km to go. We decided to go for the sprint with Wout, and it was the wrong decision. We can be honest about that, we also underestimated Neilson. Chapeau to him and congrats. That was a great sprint from him."

“I wouldn’t say it was so much of a surprise,” he continued, although it was, for everyone. “I know Neilson, I know how fast he is. [He’s] super explosive, and Wout, and also [those] in the car, decided to go for the sprint instead of attack, and this is a decision we made because we weren’t comfortable with the gap we had at a certain point and we made the wrong decision.”

"It's going to take me a while to see the positive side of this,” Van Aert told Wielerflits. “If you don't win with three men in a group of four, you always make a mistake. I said I wanted to go for the sprint, so now I have to take responsibility and be hard on myself.

The disbelief of Wednesday will not create belief for Sunday, or a week after at Paris-Roubaix. That’s the true cost of this defeat. They can claim the plan worked, but with this result, it couldn't have. The men in yellow will have to hope things come good for them at the Tour of Flanders, or it will be another difficult post-mortem.

Explore More

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Adam Becket
News editor

Adam is Cycling Weekly’s news editor – his greatest love is road racing but as long as he is cycling, he's happy. Before joining CW in 2021 he spent two years writing for Procycling. He's usually out and about on the roads of Bristol and its surrounds.

Before cycling took over his professional life, he covered ecclesiastical matters at the world’s largest Anglican newspaper and politics at Business Insider. Don't ask how that is related to riding bikes.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.