A great saddle which I found comfortable when riding on the rivet, sitting back comfortably for easy rides, both on and off the road. The construction is light, considering the price tag, making this a competitive entry from Liv. The only width available is 155mm, and we'd like to see more options in the future.
Limited width options
Liv (opens in new tab) is not a brand whose saddle (opens in new tab) reputation precedes it. The Taiwanese sister brand to Giant has an own-brand version of pretty much everything required to ride – but it's better known for its bikes. This is a shame, really, as the saddles on offer here are actually rather good.
Join any women's-only ride and saddle discomfort (opens in new tab) is guaranteed to come up as a topic of conversation several times, which is perhaps why Liv has put so much energy into offering a comfortable solution: bad saddles put a lot of women off cycling before they have a chance to get hooked, so it's in the brand's interest to create bikes adorned with good saddles.
The Alacra is available in two guises: the SL and SLR. We have the former on test, which features a carbon composite shell and stainless steel rails, as opposed to the pure carbon of the 180g (claimed) SLR.
Liv Alacra: construction
The overall shape sits somewhere between the traditional, long-nosed saddle, and the 'noseless' designs that have become popular as of late, this particular perch measures 248mm. When putting an effort in, I felt very planted – exactly as you tend to when sitting optimally on a short-nosed saddle, but when moving around for climbs and descents I found the length meant I could always find support beneath me, something I have found lacking in the more time trial focused snub-nosed offerings.
The saddle curves slightly, waving from a high rear, to a dipped middle and slanting nose. Regardless if I was riding a road bike on tarmac or gravel bike off-road, this provided a comfortable level of support as I deposited my weight into the central groove.
The shape and size of the cut-out on a saddle is always extremely pivotal in my opinion of it, and I'm happy to report that in this case Liv got it just right (for me) – I experienced no unpleasant chafing or 'falling in' which can result from a relief channel which is either too small or too large. This is very much a case of personal preference though, if it helps I also get on well with the Specialized Romin Evo (opens in new tab) and Selle Italia SLR Lady Flow. (opens in new tab)
The brand says that the padding uses "high-elastic, free-flowing particles" which "reduce pelvic pressure by more than 20 per cent by distributing pressure across a broader contact area." This claim is a little empty without knowing what sort of saddle we're comparing to, to arrive at the 20 per cent reduction. However, it seemed to do its job alongside the Rebound foam inserts, as I didn't experience any pressure, even on four-hour rides.
Atop of the padding is a microfibre upper, which looks smart. The saddle comes in black only, which is a marked improvement from some of the white/purple/black models I've seen in the past from Liv, which may have blended well with certain bikes but weren't suited to paint jobs outside of the range.
Weight and price options
The carbon composite shell and stainless steel rails are a lower end option vs the SLR, but the 225g (claimed: 220g) weight means the price is lower at £69.99. For comparison's sake, the Specialized Power Expert retails at £110 and weighs 235g in the 155mm width. You could pay more to drop 40g in the SLR model, but this will be a minor performance enhancement. I've always maintained that when it comes to saddles, the most important element is finding a perch that supports you in creating a powerful, even pedal stroke. Low weight is just nice to have, and not worth breaking the bank over for most people.
My only criticism of this saddle is the limited run of widths. The test models measures in at 155mm, and there are no other options. My own sit bones come in at 169mm, which is why I typically ride a saddle at 168mm (it's best to ride a perch wider than your sit bones, but options are limited). Whilst I didn't experience any discomfort as a result, I think more options should be present here.
Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Cycling Weekly's Digital Editor Michelle Arthurs-Brennan is a traditional journalist by trade, having begun her career working for a local newspaper before spending a few years at Evans Cycles, then combining the two with a career in cycling journalism.
When not typing or testing, Michelle is a road racer who also enjoys track riding and the occasional time trial, though dabbles in off-road riding too (either on a mountain bike, or a 'gravel bike'). She is passionate about supporting grassroots women's racing and founded the women's road race team 1904rt.
Favourite bikes include a custom carbon Werking road bike as well as the Specialized Tarmac SL6.
Jumbo-Visma plan pays off to deliver Wout van Aert 'incredible' Tour de France stage at fourth attempt
After three second places, the Belgian deserved this victory
By Adam Becket • Published
Tour de France 2022 standings: Who is leading the race after stage four?
Who is on the top step at the 109th edition of the race?
By Ryan Dabbs • Published
'It will make for funny images in the end': Jasper Philipsen able to laugh off ill-informed Tour de France celebration
Belgian sprinter said 'for four or five seconds I honestly thought I won'
By Tom Thewlis • Published