International Cycling Union (UCI) President Pat McQuaid is pushing for longer doping suspensions. He told France’s L’Equipe on Monday that he would like to ban EPO users for life.

“As president of the UCI, I know that it is legally too difficult to implement such a ban,” said McQuaid. “I am, however, in favour of increasing the duration. There should be a four-year ban for those who take EPO. We’re going to propose that to the national federations soon, they will need to be on the same line as us to prevent appeals to CAS.”

A cyclists caught doping typically receives a two-year ban regardless of the drug. McQuaid suggested that the UCI should determine a ban’s length based on the drug.

“EPO is serious, and should see four years. But, Ventolin, for example, it may bring six or nine months.”

David Millar and Ivan Basso both returned successfully from their doping suspension and, based on their attitudes, were well received. Riccardo Riccò tested positive for EPO-CERA at the 2008 Tour de France and received a different reception when he returned to race this April. There are more cyclists waiting to return, too: Franco Pellizotti, Danilo Di Luca, Davide Rebellin…

“OK, but what has he done to repair the damage he has caused to cycling and his sponsor? It irritates me when I see riders return and want to make as much money as before.

“Riccò? I’ll just say that the leaders of team [Vacansoleil] were naive. Riccò would never join my team if I was the team manager.”

L’Equipe’s reporter asked McQuaid if he was happy to see Italy’s Basso return and win the Giro d’Italia this year.

“I was very, very happy for him,” said McQuaid. “He was the first to admit his guilt. When he was suspended, he said, ‘I accept the penalty, I want to come back with a good image.’ He told me how much he suffered. When he took his children to school, he put a hat and glasses so that he would not be recognised.”

The UCI introduced its biological passport at the start of the 2008 season as a way to detect doping without an actual positive test result. Scientists are able to monitor the rider’s blood and urine values over time to look for suspicious changes.

The biological passport may have helped curb doping cases, but mainstream media still sees cycling as a sport for dopers. The recent investigation in Spain involving Eufemiano Fuentes, Operación Galgo, may help point the media towards other sports.

“Some of the media think that a cyclist cannot do without doping. But we have great credibility with the IOC [International Olympic Committee] and WADA [World Anti-Doping Agency].”

Related links

UCI brands Landis a liar in latest publication

Subscribe to Cycling Weekly: The perfect Christmas gift>>

  • MikeCope

    A life ban should extend to any involvement in the sport ie as coach or manager -the sport is full of people who continue to make big money BY EXPLOITING THEIR DOPING HISTORY eg – B Riis who now has a book !

  • Mark Jones

    Lifetime bans are all well and good, but meanwhile footballers and tennis players carry on doping without any controls.

  • Marky Maek

    About time too !! I agree absolutely with McQuaid’s comments – I do believe that all cyclists found guilty of drugs use should be banned for life from the sport. The problem has not gone away, and this may be the only way of ensuring that it does.

    And yes, I’m afraid that that would include the good guys like David Miller & Ivan Basso.

    The softly softly approach hasn’t worked – time to get tough.

  • Ken Evans

    “OK, but what has he done to repair the damage
    he has caused to cycling and his sponsor?
    It irritates me when I see riders return
    and want to make as much money as before.”

    At the moment it pays (sometime a lot) to dope !
    Nobody notices a clean rider finishing in the bunch,
    but a winner get publicity even if they later fail a dope test.