As the tension rises over the potential different outcomes to Alberto Contador's positive for clenbuterol, Peter Van Eenoo, the head of WADA's only accredited anti-doping lab in Belgium at the University of Ghent, has discussed the ins and outs of testing for the banned substance with Cycling Weekly.
Van Eenoo refused to discuss specific cases, although his laboratory was reportedly the one which discovered Chinese rider Fiyu Li's positive for clenbuterol this spring.
(Cycling Weekly) CW: How does testing for clenbuterol work?
(Peter Van Eenoo) PVE: Through a combined detection method called GC-MS. Part of the process is gas chromatography [GC], which separates different elements, and the other part, mass spectrometry [MS], identifies them.
CW: Any major advances in the last few years on this process?
PVE: Not over the last two decades or so. Just that the instruments which we used have got a lot more sensitive. We're getting better at detecting it.
CW: Although there have been reports that only four labs in the world could have detected the levels found recently in Alberto Contador's urine...
PVE: That story can only be completely made up. Each WADA lab only knows their own results from tests, and although we do talk to each other, we don't know where the other results have come from, they're completely anonymous. I don't see how anybody can have said that.
CW: Could a positive for clenbuterol come from other causes than direct doping?
PVE: It's possible. Contaminated products or foodstuffs are possible causes too. But in my opinion, you have to bear in mind whether it's the first athlete or athlete number 10,000 who alleges a clenbuterol positive has been caused by a particular contaminated product.
An athlete is always responsible for what is in his body fluids. If there's a positive but there's a reason for a reduction in the suspension, like food contamination, then he or she will have his sentence reduced.
CW: Why is there no limit of detection (tolerance level) when testing for clenbuterol?
PVE: Because its effect is long-term and spread out, and there's no clear correlation between the clenbuterol an athlete takes and the effect it has. On top of that, clenbuterol only breaks down in the body very slowly.
So if I took a lot and you and tested me an hour later, I might have a lot left in my system.
But if you tested me in four or five days, it might still be there. Either way you wouldn't know what effect it had had. That's why clenbuterol is always a positive.
Contador considers quitting cycling due to doping scandal
Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Founded in 1891, Cycling Weekly and its team of expert journalists brings cyclists in-depth reviews, extensive coverage of both professional and domestic racing, as well as fitness advice and 'brew a cuppa and put your feet up' features. Cycling Weekly serves its audience across a range of platforms, from good old-fashioned print to online journalism, and video.
Ask a cycling coach: ‘Should my bike rides get harder every week?’
Here’s how to ramp up your training based on the data - don’t just guess at what your sessions should be
By James Spragg • Published
Sportful WS Reflex 2 Bootie review - hardy overshoes that breathe, but they don't come cheap
Great protection and breathability for feet during long winter rides, the heel-cap cut-out might not be well-placed for all shoes though
By Emma Silversides • Published