Chris Froome anti-doping investigation should not have been made public, says British Cycling boss

Julia Harrington says case has harmed reputations before it's been established whether Froome has done anything wrong

Chris Froome places third in the elite men's time trial at the 2017 UCI Road World Championships. Photo: Yuzuru Sunada
(Image credit: Yuzuru Sunada)

British Cycling (opens in new tab) chief executive Julia Harrington has criticised the leaking of Chris Froome's adverse analytical finding for high levels of salbutamol, saying that the case has harmed the reputations of Froome, British Cycling, and cycling as a sport.

Speaking at British Cycling headquarters in Manchester, Harrington said that she was disappointed that news of the anti-doping investigation into Froome had become public knowledge, and that reputations had been tarnished before it had been decided whether Froome had broken any rules.

"While someone is trying to prove either way [like Froome is] it’s being debated in the court of public opinion and of course that’s a blow to cycling’s reputation, the athletes reputation and it’s not a nice situation to deal with," Harrington said.

"You only need to read the comments below articles to see people will make up their mind without the full evidence, which is a shame.

"I would rather that info hadn’t been leaked so we could deal with a situation where the athlete is banned or a situation where the athlete is able to prove a finding and they can carry on with their career as normal."

>>> Chris Froome is back on Strava and the rides he's been uploading are incredible

Froome denies exceeding the permitted dosage for salbutamol of 800mg per 12 hours, and must prove that the high concentration of the asthma drug found in his urine after stage 17 of the 2017 Vuelta a España was not as a result of exceeding that dosage.

Salbutamol is classified as a specified substance, meaning that Froome is able to race and is not subject to a provisional suspension while the investigation is ongoing. Under normal circumstances, investigations into adverse analytical findings for specified substances would not be made public unless it was concluded that the rider had broken anti-doping rules and was subject to a ban.

Watch: Giro d'Italia route guide 2018

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWVoFpEyh_I

With Froome still able to compete, Harrington also said that the four-time Tour de France winner is still eligible for selection for the Great Britain squad, although she hoped that the matter would be resolved by the time of the 2018 Road World Championships, which take place in Innsbruck, Austria in September.

“He’s not banned he’s available for selection," Harrington continued. "There is the option for an athlete to rule himself out of selection under the rules of racing he is available and innocent until proven guilty.

"When we approach a race where we’re looking at selection decisions, we’ll have a choice to make at that point."

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Henry Robertshaw began his time at Cycling Weekly working with the tech team, writing reviews, buying guides and appearing in videos advising on how to dress for the seasons. He later moved over to the news team, where his work focused on the professional peloton as well as legislation and provision for cycling. He's since moved his career in a new direction, with a role at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.