You don't need £800 worth of gadgets to ride a bike – cycling should be inexpensive and accessible

This article is part of a series called ‘A love letter to…’, where Cycling Weekly writers pour praise on their favourite cycling items and share the personal connection they have with them. In this case, however it is a break-up letter to expensive cycling gadgets.

Every now and then, and against my better judgement, I’ll go on Facebook on my phone. It’s a motor reaction, really, a learned behaviour from an adolescence spent growing up on the app. I can’t bring myself to delete it. Sometimes I’ll lose an hour to the scrolling.

Anyway, I was on Facebook the other day, and I came across an article. The headline was something about all the things a cyclist needs, the trinkets they daren’t leave home without. Instinctively, I clicked on it. I wanted to feel smug. After all, I, one of those society calls a ‘keen cyclist’, would be certain to score a full house.

Well, you can imagine my surprise when I didn't have a single one.

I was stunned by the first item, actually. According to the list, the opening safety essential is a ‘radar’. If you don’t know what that is, then don’t worry, neither really did I, but I’ve since discovered it’s a small device that detects vehicles as they approach you, and alerts you to their presence on your GPS computer.

It’s a task my eyes and ears have managed fine so far. Besides, with the amount of cars that pass me in central London, I’d receive more alerts than Tadej Pogačar gets Instagram notifications.

The list goes on. Camera. Nah. Crash sensor. Nah. Rearview glasses. Who am I… Inspector Gadget? It quickly becomes clear that the items on the list are more Silicon Valley than Wye Valley. They’re about as essential to riding a bike as a sequin collar or swimming armbands. (Neither of which I have, by the way.)

There are, of course, a few more rudimentary products there, too: a hi-vis vest, for example, the garment of choice of school lunchtime supervisors, and a bell – you remember, the little metal thing you ripped off the handlebars as soon as you got your new bike home.

Call me smarmy for turning my nose up at this, but my frustration isn’t really about the list. Cycling, at its core, should be a straightforward, accessible thing. All you really need is a bike. If you're riding outdoors at night, I'd suggest you spend a few quid on some lights, too.

To an outsider, a budding two-wheeler, lists like these risk fostering an elitism that, to do our sport, you need an Aladdin’s cave of gizmos. If I were to buy every item, it would cost me the best part of £800, and that’s before the cost of the actual bike.

Most people take great joy in pootling around on a scuffed, second-hand hack-around – no rearview glasses, no high-end radar, just a whirring chain and a smile. That’s what cycling is about.

Forgive me for saying this, but perhaps our sport could take a few pointers from football. One of the reasons football is so popular around the world is because of how easy, and inexpensive, it is to play it: you put down a ball and kick it. Cycling, too, can be just as simple. But, strictly speaking, you only need to kick your bike when the gears pack in.

Disclaimer: Let me be the first to acknowledge the irony of this article containing links to Cycling Weekly's buyer's guides. These serve to help people make their own decisions on which products to purchase. Few, if any, of the items listed are essential. Do not feel compelled to buy anything.