New Belgian tax laws set to hit pockets of Mathieu van der Poel and Tom Dumoulin as well as Belgian WorldTour teams
Big names like Philippe Gilbert, Jasper Stuyven and Tim Wellens will be unaffected as they reside in Monaco
Riders and cycling teams are set to be affected by tax reform in Belgium, as the government looks to raise revenues by changing athletes' social security contributions.
Currently, the social security contributions (NSSO) of top athletes are calculated on a fictitious gross salary of €2,352 and the government calculates that the planned changes will raise an additional €43 million.
WorldTour outfits Lotto-Soudal and Intermarché-Wanty-Gobert, as well as Alpecin-Fenix, are set to be hit hardest by the reforms as they pay higher wages compared to other Belgian teams such as Sport Vlaanderen-Baloise and Bingoal-Wallonie Bruxelles. Meanwhile, Deceuninck - Quick-Step won't be affected as they're based in Luxembourg despite having their main office in Wevelgem.
As for riders, Belgian stars such as Philippe Gilbert, Jasper Stuyven and Tim Wellens will escape the changes as they live in Monaco, while Dutch nationals Tom Dumoulin and Mathieu van der Poel will be amongst the hardest hit as they both live in Belgium.
>>> Images of Wout van Aert's biggest wins sold as NFTs, bids top $2000 after 24 hours
The Belgian Cycling Federation has met with government finance minister Vincent Van Peteghem before holding further talks with another minister called Frank Vandenbroucke about the reforms, the federation being the official employer of all professional cyclists who reside in the country.
Jos Smets, who has represented the federation during these talks, told Het Laatste Nieuws the impact on cycling will be a drop in the ocean compared to how the changes will affect the country's footballers and football teams.
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
"The total wage bill in cycling is about 14 million," Smet said. "That's ten to fifteen times less than in football, I estimate."
Rather than rail against the reforms, Smets says well-off sports stars should have to contribute more in social security payments.
"The situation as it was now in sports was socially unacceptable," Smet argued. "We don't want to undermine the principle that the more you earn, the more you have to pay. The situation as it was now in sport was socially unacceptable."
Athletes will still pay less tax than a normal employee on the same salary in the new system, due to the government's understanding that sporting careers are much shorter than regular ones.
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1