Tobias Foss' 68t chainring is big - but it's not a big deal
Just Google "gear ratios", says Ineos' Performance Engineer Dan Bigham
'Dinner plate' is a phrase that has been associated with time trialling for many years now. Of course, we are not talking about rider's pre-race meals, but instead the huge chainrings fitted to pro's bikes when they race against the clock.
Ten years ago, you'd be shocked to find a 58t chainring on the cranks of a WorldTour TT bike, but now, a 62t setup is commonplace. That said, when Tobias Foss rolled off of the start ramp at stage 2 of the UAE Tour, cycling fans collectively raised eyebrows at his mammoth 68t gear.
You may be wondering how anyone could push such a huge gear, but as we reveal, the setup is actually just common sense.
Performance Engineer for Foss' Ineos Grenadiers team, Dan Bigham, as ever took a pragmatic approach - encouraging anyone questioning the equipment choice to "Google gear ratios".
For all the commenters saying they couldn’t turn that chainring, please Google “gear ratios” 😅 https://t.co/jAC12uneHR pic.twitter.com/19vBFkgpxyFebruary 19, 2024
To shed some light on the mammoth chainring, used bikecalc.com's online software to compare a 54t chainring, common on the road, to Foss' 68t setup. Sure enough, a 54x11 is actually a slightly bigger gear than a 68x14, and both propel the riders around 56kph at a cadence of 90rpm.
Fittingly, the Ineos Grenadier, who finished 14 seconds behind Brandon McNulty, completed the 12.7km time trial in 13:41 seconds, which makes for an average speed of 55.6kph.
It seems likely, then, that the choice of gearing is about drivetrain efficiency over a desire to pound a big gear. The large chainring up front would allow Foss to spend the majority of the time in the middle of the cassette, meaning he could achieve a straighter chainline.
Using a larger chainring, and therefore cassette sprocket, means the chain doesn't have to turn around such a tight radius, which can also have a negative impact on efficiency.
To put a number on this saving over a 54x11 setup is tricky given the selection of different components at play here, but we are likely looking at a 1% saving as a conservative estimate. Using a once again conservative power of 420 watts, that still amounts to 4.2 watts saved, which at 56kph, is a serious saving.
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
Joe is Cycling Weekly's tech writer. He's always had a love for bikes, since first riding a two wheeled steed before the age of four. Years down the line, Joe began racing at 16, and enjoyed great experiences internationally, racing in Italy, Spain and Belgium to name a few locations. Always interested in tech, Joe even piloted his Frankenstein hill climb bike to a Junior National Title in 2018. After taking a step back from elite level racing in April 2022, Joe joined our team as a freelancer, before becoming Tech Writer in May 2023.
-
The Oura ring reviewed: is this wellness tracker helpful to cyclists?
With its focus on recovery and wellness, the Oura ring offers unique insights but is it worth the investment over other wearables?
By Anne-Marije Rook Published
-
Shimano RC703 road shoe review: sleek, stiff and robust
Shimano's second-tier offering combines a rigid carbon sole with handy Boa dials and protective toe caps
By Sam Gupta Published