Garmin Rally power meter pedals review

Garmin's power meter family lets you swap one spindle between pedal bodies, maintaining consistent data across all disciplines. At a cost.

Garmin Rally pedals
(Image credit: Dan Gould for Future)
Cycling Weekly Verdict

The Rally family carries over everything we loved about the Vector 3s, and nothing we didn’t. The unique selling point is the ability to swap the spindles between road and off-road riding, but buyers should be aware that this is not a quick pre-ride job and nor is it the most cost-effective solution.

For
  • +

    Reliable

  • +

    Weather-resistant

  • +

    Aesthetics

Against
  • -

    Expensive

  • -

    Most multi-discipline riders change bikes more often than it is practical to change spindles

 

Garmin’s Rally power meter pedals aim to be the very first to provide true cross-compatibility for riders of varying disciplines - with a single spindle that can be swapped between RS (Shimano), RK (Look) and XC (Shimano SPD) style pedals. The goal is to provide reliable data on any bike the owner chooses to ride.

The Rally family unseats Garmin’s Vector, the third version of which was launched with a battery door cover that was the source of frustration for many a user, myself included. However, as well as the new system agnostic pedal bodies, the Rally features a redesign that appears to have been victorious in the battle for reliability once and for all. 

Garmin Rally RK200: construction 

 

The body of the Rally RK looks identical to the Look-compatible Vector 3 before it - which is pretty slick for a power meter pedal. Other versions in the market - the Favero Assioma and Powertap Quarq P2 - don’t look nearly so unobtrusive.

The pedals are fitted and removed with a 15mm spanner, and take either four LR44/SR44 or two CR1/3N batteries. Changing batteries is as simple as using a 4mm Allen key to loosen the door, which now mates with a metal insert, drastically reducing the chance of cross-threading leading to water damage.

Garmin rally

(Image credit: Dan Gould/Future)

Release tension can be adjusted via a small Alley key adjustment at the rear of the pedal. There’s also a screw that holds the pedal jaw in place, which is tightened up by a 2mm Allen key. Experiences with the Vector 3 lead me to suggest riders check this is snugged up occasionally over long-term use, I did have mine work its way loose but this hasn't repeated itself on the Rally as yet.

garmin rally

(Image credit: Dan Gould/Future)

Accuracy is a claimed +/-1 per cent. This refers to the unit's own accuracy to itself - no power meter's accuracy claim is against 'finite power', and studies have shown drift between units is substantial. However, comparison testing showed results very close to that of a Quarq DZero implying good calibration here. 

The battery life is a claimed 120 hours. Many factors will influence this, but I got to around 90 hours before receiving a ‘battery low’ message.

The pedals are Bluetooth and ANT+ compatible. The Q-factor is 53mm, or 55mm if you use supplied washers, and the stack height is 12.2mm. The pedals weighed in at 165g and 166g respectively (331g for the pair).

My test pair is the Rally RK200 - which is dual-sided; the RK100 is single-sided and can be upgraded at a later date.

Garmin Rally RK200: swapping spindles

 

The Rally party trick is that you can swap the spindle between pedals. For example, you might own the Rally RK and Rally XC bodies, giving you the opportunity to use the same strain gauge across all of your rides. 

This is of course more hassle than having a power meter on each bike. However, in most cases, it's cheaper, and because there is drift between units, it does remove the need to complete an FTP test on every bike/power meter to ensure that set zones are accurate. 

I don’t have a spare pair of pedal bodies to swap between - but I did try removing and replacing the spindle to understand how easy, or otherwise, the process would be. 

Image 1 of 3

garmin rally

(Image credit: Future)
Image 1 of 3

garmin rally

(Image credit: Future)

At the Rally launch, Garmin suggested the swap would take “five to 10 minutes, with experience”, adding “we're looking at it more as a seasonal change but we see some riders changing every week if they want to."

The process is much like carrying out a pedal service. I don’t want to write a ‘how to’ here, that’s best left to Garmin’s video.

First time round, it took me 20 minutes. No doubt I'd speed up over time, but it's something you'd want to do the night before a ride and not whilst brewing coffee on the day. There are quite a few small parts, not less the tiny screws that need to be removed. I would wager that the heads of these would not take kindly to a weekly change - seasonal would be a much more sensible interval.

The process involved is somewhat of a fly in the ointment of a very good idea. Many riders who switch between road and gravel or mountain bike riding do so several times a week - I know I do. I wouldn’t repeat this process every time, I'd likely use the pedals for my road racing and training and only for an off-road event or race.

 Garmin Rally RK200: the ride

 

My experience with the Garmin Rally RK200 pedals has been excellent - I’ve enjoyed every positive element of the Garmin Vector 3s, without the pitfalls. 

The pedals look just like any pair from Look, and the operational mechanics are similar - the hold on the cleat is firm and can be easily adjusted via the small screw at the rear.

I’ve been using these pedals since late February, through to the end of May - and have racked up 90 hours of riding. The reported battery life of 120 hours may therefore be a little ambitious, as I have performed one change - but I did do so as soon as the ‘battery low’ message arrived. I’ve used the pedals only for my road riding since I don’t have an XC model - but I’ve dragged them through plenty of ill-advised conditions. 

garmin rally

(Image credit: Future)

The pedals have been quick to connect to my device in almost all instances, though I am using a friendly bedfellow in the Garmin Edge 1030 and occasionally 530 computers.

I had briefly believed that the Rally pedals might be reading lower than my previous Favero pedals, judging by low power output at an early season time trial. However, it quickly transpired that the underperforming component was me; a few events in and the numbers were back to normal.

When power meter brands provide ‘accuracy’ percentages, such as the +/-1 we have here, they refer to the unit's accuracy to itself - so 200 watts is only ever read as between 198 and 202 watts on that particular unit, so you can trust that your zones are correct on any day of the week. 

The fact that no manufacturer's claims relate to 'finite power' means that, arguably, comparing one unit to another is actually fairly futile unless you're collecting a lot of data for a major study. However, it is interesting to keep a check on how great the drift could be between units, so I did it anyway. 

I chose my ‘descending recovery sweetspot intervals’ session as the comparison mining site, and I was pretty impressed to find that the Rally pedals provided extremely similar readings to the Quarq DZero fitted to a SRAM Red eTap bike I also have on test. 

To be honest, the 1-2 watt differences could easily be put down to the fact that it's near impossible to press 'lap' on two computers simultaneously whilst on the rollers.

Descending Recovery Sweetspot session, average interval power
LapQuarqRally
1 - warm up115115
2 - sweetspot223221
3 - recovery141141
4 - sweetspot224222
5 - recovery129131
6 - sweetspot220222
7 - recovery131136
8 - sweetspot221224
11 - cool down126129

Just like the Vector 3 before it, the Rally pedals provide a range of additional data points, such as left/right balance, pedal smoothness, power phase, platform offset and information on how much time you spend seated or standing. 

Personally, the only data point I regularly use of left/right balance - if this begins to skew outside of 48/52 it generally tells me I’m about to develop some back pain and need to book in with my friendly osteopath.

Platform offset is only really useful in conjunction with bike fitting tools, and pedal smoothness/power phase/time seated or standing are metrics you might use if you had a particular process goal in mind. The pedals collect and display all the data, anyhow, so if you want it you can be sure it’ll be there.

Garmin Rally RK200: value and conclusions  

 

Garmin’s Rally RK/RS200 pedals cost £969.99, the XC model is steeper still at £1059.99 and if you want to make the most of the swapping functionality, you’ll want a set of pedal bodies at £179.99 for the RS/RK or £219.99 for the XC - that brings you to £1189.98 if you’d like an RS pair and XC bodies.

Comparatively, the Favero Assioma pedals come in at £699 - and our experience has shown that they’re extremely reliable and easy to live with, thanks to the rechargeable battery. 

The only thing that the Garmin Rally provides which the Favero doesn't is the RS/Shimano style pedal system which has so far evaded the power meter world, and the off-road compatibility. 

Garmin Rally pedals

(Image credit: Future)

The benefit of power meter pedals has always been most felt by those who own multiple bikes. But emerging alternatives mean the pedal is no longer necessarily the most cost-effective option. SRAM’s new Rival groupset, for example, lets you add a single sided crank arm power meter for an additional £230 - so SRAM users could fit out five bikes for the price of one set of Rally pedals and additional bodies. 

In short - Garmin’s Rally pedals have proved to be reliable and accurate. They look great and don’t add much to the weight of the bike. They are however expensive. For some riders, the ability to use the same power meter across all bikes and disciplines will justify the cost, if that's not you, there are plenty of other good options out there.

Garmin Rally specification

  • RRP: £969.99
  • Weight: 331g per pair
  • RK200 - dual sided, also available as RK100, RS200/100 and XC200/100
  • Bluetooth and Ant+ enabled
  • Claimed battery life: 120 hrs, ~100 hours on test
  • Q Factor 53mm/55mm with washers
  • Stack height 12.2mm
  • Claimed accuracy +/-1%
Michelle Arthurs-Brennan
Michelle Arthurs-Brennan

Cycling Weekly's Tech Editor Michelle Arthurs-Brennan is a traditional journalist by trade, having begun her career working for a local newspaper before spending a few years at Evans Cycles, then combining the two with a career in cycling journalism.


When not typing or testing, Michelle is a road racer who also enjoys track riding and the occasional time trial, though dabbles in off-road riding too (either on a mountain bike, or a 'gravel bike'). She is passionate about supporting grassroots women's racing and founded the women's road race team 1904rt.


Favourite bikes include a custom carbon Werking road bike as well as the Specialized Tarmac SL6. 


Height: 166cm

Weight: 56kg