Another year, another annoying choice between Paris-Nice and Tirreno-Adriatico
The two premier stage races clashing is a continued bane for all fans of cycling, and points to a bloated sport
News editor at Cycling Weekly, Adam brings his weekly opinion on the goings on at the upper echelons of our sport.
This piece is part of The Leadout, the offering of newsletters from Cycling Weekly and Cyclingnews. To get this in your inbox, subscribe here.
Good morning, and welcome back to The Leadout. I hope you’re well and as excited as I am by the return of proper racing. I watched Strade Bianche with my friends at the weekend, and while both races were won by their respective favourites, it was good to see the best riders in the world going up against each other again. I can’t wait for Flanders, now. As always, if you want to get in touch, let me know what race you’re most looking forward to this spring, I’m adam.becket@futurenet.com.
The year is 2024 and we live in a world where Paris-Nice and Tirreno-Adriatico are still run concurrently. There are two WorldTour stage races, of more or less equal importance, on at the same time, in two bordering European countries. 11 years ago, there was talk and hope of the pair being given different slots in the season, but that appears to be a long-lost dream now, with the pair seemingly inseparable.
As it is, we all do the same dance every year, switching between the two depending on what the most interesting looking stage is, and getting confused all the while. Is Jonas Vingegaard at Paris-Nice or Tirreno? Is that Mark Cavendish, I didn’t know he was here? Wait, are Lotto Dstny not riding this race? It goes on.
Of course, Paris-Nice and Tirreno are not the only races to clash, but they are the only WorldTour races to overlap by more than a day or two.
Both races have their merits, although they are largely similar: Paris-Nice being an eight-day affair with punchy stages, time trials, sprints, and proper climbing thrown in; Tirreno-Adriatico, meanwhile, is a seven-day race with proper climbing, time trials, sprints and punchy stages thrown in.
That feels glib, and both are actually great entertainment, especially in the early season, as narratives start to bubble. However, those narratives are affected by both WorldTour races running at the same time, and effectively splitting the field. We can’t know how old teammates Primož Roglič and Vingegaard will match up, because the former is in France, while the latter is in Italy. The same with sprint rivals, like Tim Merlier and Fabio Jakobsen, or Classics stars like Mads Pedersen and Julian Alaphilippe. They’re at different races, with different fields, so it’s hard to measure anything up.
When explaining the cycling season to a non-obsessive, like I’m sure many of us are, it’s easy to sketch it out as a building up to a peak, normally either the Classics or the Tour de France. Where does Paris-Nice and Tirreno clashing fit into this? It’s hard to define. This one is the top race at this time of the year, but so is the other one. It doesn’t really make sense.
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
Splitting the WorldTour peloton like this just feels mad, and also makes for slightly devalued racing on either side of the Alps. There is history to thank for their concurrent running - both are key to the Classics build up and Tirreno used to be the stage race for Italians, while Paris-Nice was there for French riders - but bike racing is a bit more international these days. And their dates don’t need to be set in stone.
The solution to this is to give the races different slots in the calendar, a solution which feels reasonably simple to do, given next week is empty of WorldTour racing until Milan-San Remo on the Saturday. It would require a shifting round of programmes and schedules, sure, especially as much of the Tirreno peloton are riders who have stuck around after Strade Bianche, but sometimes things need to change.
Meanwhile, we will continue to channel surf between the two races, hoping to catch the best of the action and work out some kind of narrative. Well, I won’t, I’ll be watching Paris-Nice, because I prefer it. Just don’t tell the Italians.
This piece is part of The Leadout, the offering of newsletters from Cycling Weekly and Cyclingnews. To get this in your inbox, subscribe here.
If you want to get in touch with Adam, email adam.becket@futurenet.com.
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Adam is Cycling Weekly’s news editor – his greatest love is road racing but as long as he is cycling on tarmac, he's happy. Before joining Cycling Weekly he spent two years writing for Procycling, where he interviewed riders and wrote about racing. He's usually out and about on the roads of Bristol and its surrounds. Before cycling took over his professional life, he covered ecclesiastical matters at the world’s largest Anglican newspaper and politics at Business Insider. Don't ask how that is related to cycling.
-
Tweets of the week: Pogačar can be beaten, Pidcock meets the royals, and Remco's an Arsenal fan
Sadly for Tadej Pogačar, serial winning doesn't seem to apply to go karting
By Tom Davidson Published
-
Friday roundup: Rapha does sportswear, Oakley meets PNS and Restrap makes a vest
Two new clothing lines, some hi-tech smart glasses and a hydration vest to inspire you to ride further
By Luke Friend Published
-
I went to Amsterdam and it showed me how much better cycling could be in the UK
While in the UK we have a "plan for drivers", in the Netherlands everything is just done by bike, and it's good
By Adam Becket Published
-
Do longer races actually mean better bike racing?
Milan-San Remo is shorter than 300km this year - shock! - but other races are getting longer. Is that actually a good thing?
By Adam Becket Published
-
What’s the point in keeping a bike launch secret when everyone already knows about it?
The Factor Ostro was teased for a couple of months ahead of its release, but hardly subtly. Why?
By Adam Becket Published
-
Opinion: Don’t take your local bike shop for granted
As grumbling about the Cycle to Work scheme continues, it’s time for all of us to value our local shop
By Adam Becket Published
-
2024 should be the year of achievable cycling goals
Don’t overstretch yourself or push too hard, but aim for targets you can hit
By Adam Becket Published
-
Opinion: Why I won't be doing the Festive 500 this year, or probably ever
The idea of suffering over the Christmas period for fun is not an attractive one to me
By Adam Becket Published
-
Opinion: Cycling has an inclusivity problem
The abuse of an American crit rider shows just how far we have to go as a sport to be more equitable and open
By Adam Becket Published
-
Launched to great fanfare in April is the National Cycling League in trouble already?
Just one race in, the National Racing League is dropping races, changing CEOs and its race management company, and being rather quiet. Is the NCL already in trouble?
By Henry Lord Published