The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) has hailed the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s decision to ban Italian riders Franco Pellizotti and Pietro Caucchioli as a “major step forward in the anti-doping fight”.

Pellizotti and Caucchioloi were suspended due to irregularities in their biological passports – the UCI’s anti-doping system that monitors the make-up of riders’ blood and urine throughout the year. Adverse levels or irregularities in a rider’s values – such as haematocrit or hormone levels – could indicate the use of banned performance-enhancing drugs or blood doping techniques.

“The UCI expresses its entire satisfaction that the quality of the work carried out by its anti-doping and legal services is acknowledged by these CAS decisions,” the UCI said in a statement issued on Wednesday.

“It would also like to thank the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) for its support since the launch of the biological passport and the assistance it has provided, particularly with the management of cases arising from this innovative tool.

“The decisions announced by CAS yesterday are a major step forward in the anti-doping fight: they confirm the validity of the biological passport as an essential instrument in the fight against doping, which will most certainly become part of the arsenal of other international sporting federations that wish to draw on the UCI’s experience.

“The decisions also reinforce the UCI’s determination to continue its uncompromising policy of many years in the fight against doping and to continually improve its anti-doping measures.”

Pellizotti’s case had brought the controversial biological passport system into doubt – the 2009 Tour de France king of the mountains was provisionally suspended in May 2010 by the UCI on the basis of irregularities in his blood samples, but was later acquitted by the Italian anti-doping tribunal.

The UCI subsequently lodged an appeal with CAS to uphold the two-year ban, and CAS ruled in the UCI’s favour.

It’s a landmark case since neither rider directly failed a test for a specific banned substance, but CAS assessed that the evidence produced by the biological passport system was sound enough to enforce a ban.

Pellizotti, however, has been less than impressed with CAS’s decision to suspend him for two years – he has now said that he’s quitting cycling for good.

Related links

Pellizotti’s two-year ban upheld

October 2010: Pellizotti acquitted by Italian Olympic Committee

Pellizotti out of the Giro due to biological passport findings

Pellizotti faces two year ban for bio passport anomaly

Pellizotti questions biological passport methods

  • Ken Evans

    Many doping cases are taking a long time to process.
    Costing a lot of money, and upsetting a rider’s career,
    and team contract.

    A simple pass/fail system is the aim,
    with the variation is testing performance in different labs,
    a standardized level needs to be set if possible,
    i.e. minimum levels of drugs (Contador),
    likely performance advantage if any, etc.

    The bio-passport needs refinement so it can’t be disputed,
    and is much easier to administer.

    If WADA has a large database of all riders profiles,
    it can better judge an abnormal set of values,
    this will take several years to accumulate.

  • dave

    Did not fail any test but based on irregularities he gets 2 years ban and the UCI are euphoric, Albero fails test and also evidence of plasticizers found which also could detect irregularities and no suspension enforced, no wonder Pellizotti states he has no faith in the system.
    Gents of the UCI you are well past your sell by date.

  • dicky

    Rather amused by the strop on – the cycling equivalent of taking my ball home.