The 2017 Tour de France’s close classification battle makes it difficult to understand where Chris Froome (Sky) made the winning master stroke.
>>> How good was the 2017 Tour de France? Riders and sports directors have their say
Froome, who gained 25 seconds on Rigoberto Urán (Cannondale-Drapac) in the 22.5-kilometre time trial in Marseille on Saturday, dealt small blows to his rivals instead of a decisive one.
“I think all this started in the opening time trial in Düsseldorf,” Jim Ochowicz, manager for team BMC Racing told Cycling Weekly.
A super opening time trial was Froome’s key to winning the 2017 Tour (Sunada)
“We lost two classification contenders on the first day, Alejandro Valverde and Ion Izagirre, others lost time due to the weather. And those that survived disappeared later with [Jakob] Fuglsang and [Geraint] Thomas crashing.”
Ochowicz’s star rider Richie Porte abandoned due to stage nine crash to Chambéry. The Tasmanian had begun the Tour as the favourite to take on Froome.
The loss of Richie Porte from the race took away perhaps the only rider who could match Froome in time trials (Sunada)
“The first time trial that Chris did [was the key point] because coming out of the Dauphiné, everyone had written him off,” Sky boss David Brailsford said.
“Richie was the favourite coming in and people thought it wasn’t going to happen for Chris, but we got such a confidence boost, the whole team, by putting four in the top-10. That was critical, a real confirmation that he was good.”
Geraint Thomas was the first man to wear the maillot jaune in 2017 (Sunada)
Team Sky’s Geraint Thomas won the opening 14-kilometre time trial and carried the yellow jersey for four days.
Froome placed sixth and made a dent in the classification, putting 51 seconds into Urán who eventually finished second in Paris.
The mountain stages couldn’t separate the top-three (Sunada)
“It seems that the riders stick closer together on the big climbs then they did in the other years,” Ochowicz continued.
“The Tour was won and lost everyday in fights. You couldn’t guarantee anything. Even on the stage to Rodez, when you thought you wouldn’t see changes in the GC.”
“The surprising thing was a day to Rodez, when we didn’t expect the GC guys to lose time but yet some of them did,” Dimension Data’s performance director, Rolf Aldag explained.
“The day before, they were fighting like crazy to gain a second of two and then on a smaller uphill finish, they lose nearly half a minute.”
Fabio Aru was the only man to take the race lead from Froome, but he wasn’t able to hold the defending champion off (Sunada)
Fabio Aru (Astana) gained time with his stage five win to La Planche des Belles Filles. Froome lost time in the Peyragudes summit finish, but gained most of it back in a seemingly insignificant small uphill finish to Rodez.
“The time trials are always decisive, but if you see how close everything was,” Quick-Step Floors sports director, Tom Steels said.
“It was just days of gains and losses, and everything came down to the final time trial.
The downhill finishes did little to widen the time gaps between the overall contenders (Sunada)
“I thought there was never a deciding day in the Alps. We just saw the small time changes here and there. The top three in the GC never made a mistake but they never made a big difference.”
“The descent finishes didn’t really make a difference,” continued Aldag. “Bardet tried an attack to Chambéry but then was brought back right at the line. It was a super open Tour de France.”
Froome secured his fourth Tour victory in the time trial in Marseille(Credit: ASO/Alex Broadway)
The tightly knit classification battle, the closest in 50 years, began to unravel. Aru cracked in the Alps and three – Froome, Urán and Bardet – remained within 29 seconds. Froome, however, widened the gaps in the Marseille and Bardet crumbled.
