Pro cycling teams refused budget cap, says UCI president – 'I think they were wrong'
David Lappartient says he remains in favour of financial restrictions
Professional cycling teams refused to sign up to a budget cap, the UCI's president has revealed, adding that he feels they were "wrong" to do so.
In an interview with French newspaper Ouest-France, published on Wednesday, David Lappartient said he "remained convinced" that a financial restriction would help the sport.
The concept of a budget cap is not new to cycling, and the UCI revealed last year that it planned to implement one in coming years. At the time, a press released stated: "This aims to preserve sporting fairness by avoiding excessive disparities between teams in terms of budget."
However, those attempts appear to have failed, with the new WorldTour and Women's WorldTour licences expected to be awarded for 2026 onwards without any restrictions on spending.
"The big teams have very large budgets, and as a result, where before a relatively small sum could be enough to achieve a decent result, today you're just a bystander," Lappartient told Ouest-France. "We considered implementing a 'budget cap' for all the teams, and paradoxically, the teams didn't accept it. I was surprised that it was mostly the smaller teams that refused. I think they were wrong because it seems necessary to level the playing field."
He was speaking after the closure of Arkéa-B&B Hotels, a longstanding French pro team, which he called "sad".
The Breton squad are not the only ones disappearing this season, while the proposed merger between Intermarché-Wanty and Lotto drags on; meanwhile, the team at the top, UAE Team Emirates-XRG, won 95 races this season, the most ever. At the men's Tour de France, as many as 15 teams were searching for a new sponsor.
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
"Why vote against it when a budget cap is proposed?" Lappartient asked. "They say yes, but first the cycling model needs to change. With a budget cap, if you exceeded the limit, you had to pay a tax that went to other teams. There was a mitigating mechanism in place. When you look back at cycling history, consider La Vie Claire. They finished 1st, 2nd, 4th, 7th, and 12th in the 1986 Tour de France. And the team's budget at the time, relative to the others, was probably even higher than UAE Team Emirates'.
"I'm not saying it was right. But there have always been teams with more resources than others. The goal is to regulate things a little. And I remain convinced that a budget cap is one of the elements to achieve that."
Asked if he thought cycling's sponsorship model was outdated, the Frenchman responded: "Can't we say that cycling was undervalued compared to its true worth, and that today, it's a sport that has taken on a global dimension? And, as a result, we have sponsors of a more global scale, with more international teams.
"Perhaps this is the price of success, with cycling enjoying very high viewership. The real winners are the riders, who are earning a much better living."

Adam is Cycling Weekly’s news editor – his greatest love is road racing but as long as he is cycling, he's happy. Before joining CW in 2021 he spent two years writing for Procycling. He's usually out and about on the roads of Bristol and its surrounds.
Before cycling took over his professional life, he covered ecclesiastical matters at the world’s largest Anglican newspaper and politics at Business Insider. Don't ask how that is related to riding bikes.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.