Aero wheels don’t just look cool, we are told they make us faster too. But how much faster? Aero wheels can be expensive, so we wanted to see how much faster they typically make you to try and establish if they are worth the investment.
To do this we headed down to Herne Hill velodrome in South London to put some different wheels to the test.
>> Subscribe to Cycling Weekly this Autumn and save 35%. Enjoy the luxury of home delivery and never miss an issue <<
We have decided to test three sets of wheels
A pair of Mavic Ksryium R-Sys SLR wheels. These are to represent a typical box section, low profile wheel found on most road bikes.
The second pair, we have are ENVE Smart 4.5s. The front is 40mm deep and the rear is 50mm. This depth has been chosen as it is typical of aero wheels most professionals will opt for in road races.
Time Trial Setup
We have a Hed GT3 trispoke front and ridiculously bling Lightweight Autobahn Disc. This is widely considered to be the ultimate time trial wheel set up and has been used by Alberto Contador amongst others.
We also used it in our ‘How much speed can you buy?’ feature.
I enlisted the help of Dr Hutch who, as a professional time triallist, is an expert at riding smoothly around a track.
Each of our three sets of wheels were ridden for 10 minutes at 200W and 10 minutes at 300W. The reason for this is that we felt that 200W represents a power output sustainable by a decent club or sportive rider and that 300W is typical of a time triallist or racer. From this we wanted to establish if it is still worth getting aero wheels even if you are not riding at race pace.
All the runs began from a rolling start and we measured the distance travelled. Power measurement was via Power Tap P1 pedals and Challenge Record Tyres with Latex tubes were used on all the wheels.
Hutch rode exclusively on the drops, maintaining the same position throughout the runs and all the wheels were fitted to the same Merida Reacto Team Bike.
Now before we get on to the results, we are aware that this is not the most accurate test in the world and wind can play a part, but it is a real world test.
For all the marketing claims based around wind tunnel data, you don’t ride your bike in a wind tunnel, you ride outside and Herne Hill represents as much of a controlled outside environment you can get.
Regarding the results, the actual power Hutch recorded is provided, along with the normalised power of the run. This is important, as it shows how smoothly Hutch rode.
1) Mavic R-Sys SLR
At 200W (200W actual, 201W normalized) – Distance travelled: 5120m at 30.7 kph
At 300W (299W actual, 299W normalized) – Distance travelled: 6070m at 36.4 kph
2) Enve Smart 4.5
At 200W (202W actual, 203W normalized) – Distance travelled: 5460m at 32.7 kph
At 300W (301W actual, 302 normalized) – Distance travelled: 6442m at 38.6 kph
3) Hed GT3 Trispoke and Lightweight Autobahn
At 200W (200W actual, 202W normalized) – Distance travelled: 5520m at 33.1 kph
At 300W (300W actual, 300 normalized) – Distance travelled: 6600m at 39.6 kph
The results suggest that even when travelling at just 200W there is a significant aero benefit to some deeper wheels.
Dr Hutch suggested that this would be enhanced by the conditions on the day which were a little windy. The time trial set up was slightly faster still, perhaps less than expected.
As a veteran time triallist, Hutch speculated that he would expect the TT wheels to perform better at higher speeds approaching and exceeding 30mph.
Another thing worth pointing out is that although the results may vary slightly between different wheel brands, we can assume most deep wheels will perform to a similar level.
So there you have it, aero wheels can make you slightly faster while simultaneously making your wallet significantly lighter. Two kilometres per hour faster in this case.
However, there is no need to buy them, it ultimately depends on what you want to get out of your riding.