The $100m lawsuit hanging over Lance Armstrong may not go to court until November, but the legal wrangling has already started between Armstrong's legal team and that of the US federal government.
The lawsuit against the American former professional rider was initially filed by his former US Postal team-mate Floyd Landis under the False Claims Act. Landis was later joined by the US Justice Department.
The premise of the case is that Armstrong and the Tailwind Sports management company that owned the US Postal team, defrauded the government out of funds as Armstrong and other members of the team used performance-enhancing drugs.
>>> Lance Armstrong takes to social media after fake news sites spread rumours that he'd died
In support of their arguments, both sides have called in expert witnesses and, as reported by USA Today, have now gone before a federal judge to prevent the other side's witnesses from giving evidence.
Armstrong's lawyers have hired Douglas Kidder, who estimated that the US Postal Service gained $257m in media exposure thanks to its sponsoring of the team, which set it back $32.3m between 2000 and 2004.
However lawyers for the US Justice Department argued that "Mr. Kidder is not competent to testify about earned media in general, much less in the context of the facts of this case. The Court should not permit this testimony to be presented to the jury."
>>> Lance Armstrong: 'I admire those people who didn't dope'
On the other side, government lawyers hired Larry Gerbrandt, who claims that the 1.5 billion media impressions of Armstrong’s doping and 154 billion impressions from online media coverage negatively impacted the value of the sponsorship.
In response, Armstrong's attorneys said: "The government would like to offer Mr Gerbrandt’s counting exercise and allow the jury to speculate that the USPS suffered harm as a result of the summary and that such harm exceeded the benefits the USPS enjoyed under the sponsorship. The jury cannot be allowed to speculate on this critical issue."
With the final case being decided by a jury, both sides are eager to prevent the other side's witnesses from testifying, which could have a major impact on the ultimate decision.
-
-
Who speaks for the riders?
The formation of two riders’ unions on both the women’s and men’s sides of the sport could be about to change the shape of top level cycling. Paul Knott investigates further
By Paul Knott •
-
Tweets of the Week: Pidcock's new safety measures, Victor Crampenaerts and more
Here's a selection of our favourite tweets from the last week
By Alex Ballinger •
-
Seven things we learnt from the new Lance Armstrong documentary
The 48-year-old sheds new light on the biggest doping scandal in sporting history, and is as combative as ever
By Jonny Long •
-
Floyd Landis responds after Lance Armstrong calls him a ‘piece of s***’ in new documentary
Floyd Landis has responded after Lance Armstrong called him a “piece of s***” in a new documentary.
By Alex Ballinger •
-
'I'm not going to lie to you now': New Lance Armstrong documentary to air
The documentary features new, extensive interviews with Armstrong as well as a number of his former team-mates, rivals and friends
By Jonny Long •
-
Lance Armstrong urges riders to 'take back power' amid coronavirus uncertainty
Wages have been slashed across the peloton as teams struggle financially due to the pandemic
By Jonny Long •
-
Doping researcher who defended Lance Armstrong receives doping ban
The expert argued at the time that doping was widespread in the peloton
By Jonny Long •
-
Johan Brunyeel launches his own sports management company
Lance Armstrong’s former manage Johan Bruyneel has launched a new venture, as he tries to break into sports management.
By Alex Ballinger •
-
Lance Armstrong is hosting a Mallorca cycling tour with tickets costing $30,000
Has riding your bike with Lance Armstrong ever been on your bucket list?
By Alex Ballinger •
-
Ukrainian president compares nation to Lance Armstrong
We’ve all grown accustomed to seeing politicians grandstanding and making grandiose speeches, but a recent comment by the president of the Ukraine is likely to raise a few eyebrows.
By Alex Ballinger •
